For many,
the issue about not wanting a separate Vidarbha is an emotional issue; the language, ‘Marathi manus’ and being part of the same identity. For me, it's
a lot more than that. First of all, I really like the romantic notion that
becoming a separate state will lead to unbridled development and progress of
the region! I am all for development, I love Nagpur and there is nothing more
that I would like than progress and prosperity for people in this region….
But lets
look at some hard facts before succumbing to this dream….
Maharashtra
State was formed with three regions, Vidarbha (from CP), Marathwada (from
Nizams Hyderabad) and the rest of Maharashtra, mostly from Bombay Presidency.
1.
Districts of
Marathwada, most of Konkan and Vidarbha are pretty much at par, as regards HDI
& PCI. So in fact when we talk about Vidarbha being backward, we talk about
the rest of Maharashtra languishing behind the Mumbai/Pune region.
2.
We need to
compare ourselves with neighbouring districts of MP, as for a century, we were capital
of the Central Provinces, lets look at Seoni, Betul and Balaghat. They have a
similar demographic, Human Development Index and climatic conditions…..where
are they today and where are we? CP & Berar were in pretty much in a
similar state in 1960, today the gap is huge. Growth in Vidarbha has actually
been totally disproportionate with that of rest of MP that we left behind. Can
we even compare the HDI for Vidarbha districts with those of CG & MP?
3.
The
attitude! Of the Common Man and the Business community. We are always waiting
for a miracle! In just my memory, it was Butibori first, Asia’s biggest
industrial estate. Then MIHAN, and now separate Vidarbha. But what is the
attitude of the leaders of our business
and political Community? Are we industrious, entrepreneurial and prepared to
put in enough efforts…..or do we just want to make a quick buck from
speculation? Who invested, profited and became stake holders in the MIHAN
project? Was there anyone who came forward (with the notable exception of VED)
to become key stakeholders in the development of this crucial project? NO….the
only people who benefitted were those who speculated in real estate. In fact,
speculation is the only thriving industry here. Then who do we blame? Leaders
of Maharashtra? Were we not given enough opportunities?? So are our local
leaders and the local business community to blame or those from Mumbai/Pune??
4.
We keep
talking about Chattisgarh, yes, there was criminal negligence of CG by MP
(already a very undeveloped state), but for all talk about development in CG,
the mini-state seems to have really benefitted only very few, HDI is among the
lowest in the country, lower than Bihar, Orissa and MP itself! And lets talk
about Jharkhand. Mineral-rich, small state….but in what condition?? What about governance?
Who leads this state? Smaller states (like mineral rich Chhattisgarh and
Jharkhand) are much more vulnerable to the pressures of the corporations and
multi-nationals due to their small- scale economies and the greed of the newly
emergent regional elite.
5.
What is the
political leadership here? And who will lead this state in politics and
bureaucracy?
Lets
be thankful…….thanks to Maharashtra, atleast we have a functioning legal, civic
and administrative system here. There
will be political and bureaucratic anarchy benefitting very few here. Do we
have the governance that is needed? The correct mentality for development? And
how will we handle the naxal problem? I shudder to think that like CG,
Jharkhand, the Coal Mafia, Mineral Mafia will move in quicker than we can
imagine…..
All
talks about larger states not working are irrelevant if the machinery functions
properly. Look at Texas and California, the largest states of the US that lead
the way in the worlds largest economy.
Yes,
things in MH are not all great, yes the Government needs to pull up its socks,
we need sops for underdeveloped regions, and the huge developmental backlog
needs to be cleared on priority!
BUT
is separate Vidarbha our ticket to progress or the end of a lifeline that keeps
this region way ahead of immediate neighbours? I leave that to your
discretion….
Very well written! I agree with most of your points. A separate state may not be a solution to many of our problems
ReplyDeleteAgreed that separate Vidarbha is not our ticket to progress, but we certainly need strong political presence in the Maharashtra Cabinet and ministers from the region who are pro Vidarbha and are committed to the development of this region ! Our labour is lazy which is not the case in Western Maharashtra. Why couldn't the ministers of our region promote Mihan/Butibori by providing SEZ's, tax benefits etc.
ReplyDeleteI feel the core issue is voting a good government to power.
I was always of the opinion that we should be within the state of Maharashtra !!
So we do nothing and hope for the best?
ReplyDeleteeven if the next government focuses on vidarbha for the next 5 years ,what about the 5 years after that.
at least this way we are guaranteed attention ,guaranteed separate funds from the centre,guaranteed representation in the centre,
if we had all of of the above why would the topic of vidarbh arise in the first place.
All i care about is this region getting its due,if there is any other guaranteed way can get all of the above by remaining in maharashtra i am all for it
Thanks for all your comments and insight. Here are some more from Facebook:
ReplyDeleteAnita Khosla : What you've suggested has certainly given me food for thought.
4 hrs · Unlike · 1
Ramola Naik-Singru: Good points. Divisive regional politics does not serve development. We need to have a dialogue of integration in India. Pooling resources and institutional capacities are essential for sustainability.
4 hrs · Unlike · 1
And another one from Vilas Kale: I wish you had worked on any issue regarding development of VIDARBHA and tried to get funds or support from Maharashtra govt . I have and it's frustrating . It's too large for just and fair governance
ReplyDeleteMy reply: Is separate Vidarbha the ultimate objective? or only the means to an end, which is development in this region?
So what is the development agenda after separation happens? How come no one is talking about that and it appears that having a separate state is immediately equivalent to progress and development?
VED started off with such a brilliant agenda, they had identified 11 areas of focus of which I remember three clearly; MIHAN, tourism, and mineral wealth...
With strong and committed leadership at the centre, powerful regional leaders and hopefully a committed state government, isn't now the perfect time to have a proper development agenda and all of us work towards it rather than having a separatist one?
Being pro-Maharashtra does not make me anti-development.....all I am saying is that before this irreversible step is taken, and before samyukta Maharashtra is relegated to the pages of history.....let us be 100% sure that this is the best solution. With our track record (!) of hard work, entrepreneurship and governance.....I am not convinced at all that this has been thought through fully.
We can definitely vote for a better government. It's not separate Vidarbha which will ensure our region to flourish, it's the people who need to change. Most of the contractors of our region are getting labour from CG and Odisha, this has created a shortage of labour in those states and our labourers are getting more n more lazy. Guaranteed separate funds, guaranteed attention and presence is a MYTH ... Please read the blog carefully, states like jharkhand etc have no attention. The only probable presence felt is due to the mineral/coal deposits which are mostly exported out of the state through illegal channels and mafia (refer to the blog) this is exactly the future of separate Vidarbha.
ReplyDeleteI agree with you completely. For all those screaming separate Vidarbha from the roof-tops or rather, their whatsapps, in a renewed statehood frenzy, I would like to ask whether this energy is propelled by Telangana's success or there is something more original and sustaining to it? And I am waiting to be convinced by a pro-Vidarbha person of how if Nagpur will become the next Raipur of a new state like Chhattisgarh, then what is the blueprint to prevent Gadchiroli from becoming the next Dantewada, Buldhana- the next Jagdalpur and Gondia- the next Raigarh? I think most 'neutral-on-Vidarbha-statehood' people are ignorant of how exactly Western Maharashtra and its leaders have robbed Vidarbha. Does it translated mean that our illegitimately rich-at-our-cost , fat, institution-owning leaders have actually allowed Western Maharashtra and its leaders to rob us when instead they as our elected representatives should have stood guard? In that case, when we separate as a state, would not these same illegitimately rich-at-our-cost, fat, institution-owning leaders become sole political masters of our small state's destiny? How exactly will this loot change when we become a small state? Will we then become as poor as a small state like mineral-rich Orissa so that there will be nothing to loot anymore? And, an afterthought ... who wants Vidarbha? Where exactly is the passion, the intention and the action which will justify it as a people's demand? As underscored very well (refer blog) - Vidarbha statehood vis-a-vis a developed Vidarbha - should Vidarbha statehood be the end or should it be the means to an end(!)
ReplyDelete